S2+Martel,+Elizabeth

toc =Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence.=

Role: Audience: Situation: Product/Presentation: Standards (criteria from both rubrics): || • • || • • || =Assessment Task Blue Print=
 * Performance Task (Summary in G.R.A.S.P.S. form): **(T)** ||
 * Goal:
 * Other Evidence (quizzes, test, prompts, observations, dialogues, work sample, etc.):**
 * Other Evidence **(OE)** ||
 * Student Self-Assessment and Reflection**
 * Self-Assessment **(SA)** ||

//**What understandings/goals will be assessed through this task?**// **(G)**
 * Understanding || Goal (MLR) ||

What criteria are implied in the standard(s) understanding(s) regardless of the task specifics? What qualities must student work demonstrate to signify that standards were met?
 * Big Idea || Big Idea ||

//**Through what authentic performance task will students demonstrate understandings?**//
 * //**Task Description:**// **(T)** ||

//**What student products/performances will provide evidence of desired understandings?**//
 * Type II Product || Type of Presentation ||

//**By what criteria will student products/performances be evaluated?**// • • • • • || • • • • • • ||
 * Product Criteria || Presentation Criteria ||
 * 2004 ASCD and Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe**