S2+Libby,+John

toc =Stage 2: Determine Acceptable Evidence.=

Role: An unbiased committee member presenting about the events that happened after WWI. Audience: The leaders of the Allied nations deciding the fate of the Axis nations. Situation: You are attempting to resolve content against the Axis nations so the same mistakes made after WWI are not made again. Product/Presentation: You will create a digital presentation describing the events in a specific country after WWI and how those events would cause WWII. Standards (criteria from both rubrics): Your product is your presentation so it will be graded on content and quality. Content should cover all aspects of the rubric and will be graded by content listed, historical accuracy, number of sources and if it remains unbiased. Quality should cover all aspects of the rubric and will be graded by creativity, if its an effective use of technology, grammar/technical quality and quality of graphics used. || • Quiz on countries, leaders, dates and events. • Time line of events during the period. || • Blog or write a journal about based off what they know who do they feel is responsible for WWII. • Self assess time on the rubric || =Assessment Task Blue Print=
 * Performance Task (Summary in G.R.A.S.P.S. form): **(T)** ||
 * Goal: Present an unbiased opinion of the events after WWI in a particular country that contributed to the start of WWII.
 * Other Evidence (quizzes, test, prompts, observations, dialogues, work sample, etc.):**
 * Other Evidence **(OE)** ||
 * • Prompt describing why several aspects of WWI could cause WWII.
 * Student Self-Assessment and Reflection**
 * Self-Assessment **(SA)** ||
 * • Self assess main product on the rubric

//**What understandings/goals will be assessed through this task?**// **(G)** E1 Historical Knowledge, concepts, themes and patterns ||
 * Understanding || Goal (MLR) ||
 * • Many factors after WWI in the interwar period would cause WWII, || • Maine Learning Results: Social Studies - E. History

What criteria are implied in the standard(s) understanding(s) regardless of the task specifics? What qualities must student work demonstrate to signify that standards were met?
 * Big Idea || Big Idea ||
 * • World in the contemporary era. || • Europe 1918-1945. ||

//**Through what authentic performance task will students demonstrate understandings?**//
 * //**Task Description:**// **(T)** ||
 * World War II is over and the victorious leaders of the Allies are meeting to discuss the ultimate fate of Axis countries. Many people are concerned that because of propaganda events that happened at the Treaty of Versailles at the end of World War I will happen again. In a response committee has been made to prove to the leaders of the Allied nations that World War II was not the fault of any person or country. To do this the committee has access to new technology which you will use to make an unbiased presentation of why World War II happened and how it could have been prevented. You will be assigned a specific country in which to describe specifically the events that occurred there which lead to World War II and how those events could have been different. ||

//**What student products/performances will provide evidence of desired understandings?**//
 * Type II Product || Type of Presentation ||
 * •Media Audio/Visual: comic life, imovie, garage band. || • Digital Presentation ||

//**By what criteria will student products/performances be evaluated?**// • Historical Accuracy 20% • Sources 10% • Remains Unbiased 10% || •Creative 40% • Effective use of technology 15% • Free of grammatical errors/technical glitches 15% • Exciting/Moving 20% • Graphics 10% ||
 * Product Criteria || Presentation Criteria ||
 * • Content 40%
 * 2004 ASCD and Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe**